1. Purpose and scope
This Editorial Policy applies to reviews, guides, promotional summaries, comparison content and responsible-gambling information published on this website. It covers how we select topics, verify claims, use sources, disclose affiliate relationships and handle corrections.
2. Editorial independence and affiliate disclosure
Some outbound links may be affiliate links. We may receive compensation when a reader clicks a link, creates an account or completes another qualifying action. This does not increase the price paid by the reader.
- Sponsored or affiliate links are marked with appropriate link attributes, such as
rel="sponsored nofollow". - Payment does not guarantee a positive review, a particular ranking or the removal of material criticism.
- We do not present promotional compensation as a player win, guaranteed value or risk-free opportunity.
- Readers should always confirm an operator’s current licence status, availability and terms independently.
3. Research and source standards
Writers should use primary sources whenever practical. Depending on the subject, these may include the game developer’s help files, an operator’s complete promotional terms, provincial regulator information, official privacy guidance and responsible-gambling organizations.
Material claims such as RTP, volatility, maximum win, wagering requirements, expiry periods and eligibility restrictions should be supported by a current source. When a figure can vary by operator or market, the article must say so.
4. Review methodology
Our reviews consider the product as a whole rather than relying on a single headline number. Typical criteria include:
- game mechanics, paytable clarity and documented RTP configuration;
- volatility, maximum-win information and feature frequency where published;
- mobile usability, accessibility and technical performance;
- transparency of bonus terms and significant withdrawal restrictions;
- licensing or authorization information relevant to Canadian readers;
- responsible-gambling tools, age controls and self-exclusion options;
- quality of support, payment information and complaint procedures.
Demo play may help us understand mechanics and presentation, but a short demo session cannot establish long-term payout behaviour. We do not treat personal wins or losses as evidence of RTP.
5. How we assess bonuses
Bonus amounts are never evaluated in isolation. We review the entire offer, including minimum deposit, wagering requirement, game contribution, maximum qualifying bet, time limit, payment-method exclusions, country or province restrictions and any maximum cashout.
The operator’s full terms control. Our summaries are informational and may become outdated if the operator changes or withdraws an offer. See our Bonus Terms page for the rules readers should check before claiming any promotion.
6. Updates, corrections and complaints
Content is reviewed when we learn that a material fact has changed or when a reasonable correction request is received. Significant corrections should be made promptly and, where useful, explained in the article.
- Minor spelling, formatting and clarity edits may be made without a notice.
- Material factual corrections should be documented internally and reflected in the published copy.
- Time-sensitive promotional details should display or state a review date where practical.
- Complaints are assessed on evidence, not on whether the complainant is an advertiser.
Request a correction
Send the page URL, the statement you believe is inaccurate and a reliable supporting source to {{CONTACT_EMAIL}}.
7. Canadian reference sources
These external resources help readers verify key regulatory and consumer-protection information: